Democracy 2.0

July 4, 2008

In 2006 the Dutch Huis voor de Democratie (House for Democracy) was founded. I have been a programme director from the beginning. My colleague Roel in ‘t Veld, former State Secretary and current professor, stated in his latest inaugural speech that representative democracy may have served us well in the past, but has become obsolete. The mission of our Huis voor de Democratie is to demonstrate that democracy is more than the occasional run to the ballot and to reinvent democracy as we know it. Scales have become too big (global) and too small (local) in a networked society to let the opportunities for participation go by. Representation seems to fit an inbetween size that doen not apply anymore.

Inspired by Frans de Waal and his genetic base for empathy and ethics, as well as by cognitive neurosciences, we are interested in a broad discussion about democracy and its biological roots. Is democracy as organizing principle for societies a product of our ethics, empathy and dealing with fear? Can modern, representative democracy evolve into a new organizing principle? In hopeful anticipation, we like to name this “democracy 2.0” and we are exploring the possibilities of technology. I am intrigued by mass capture and self indexing, try to figure out the difference with polls – which I don’t like – and collect cases such as Porto Alegre, a Brazilian city with 1.6 million inhabitants and a successful system for distributing government resources through popular participation.
Inspired by Frans de Waal and his genetic base for empathy and ethics, as well as by cognitive neurosciences, we are interested in a broad discussion about democracy and its biological roots. Is democracy as organizing principle for societies a product of our ethics, empathy and dealing with fear? Can modern, representative democracy evolve into a new organizing principle? In hopeful anticipation, we like to name this “democracy 2.0” and we are exploring the possibilities of technology. I am intrigued by mass capture and self indexing, try to figure out the difference with polls – which I don’t like – and collect cases such as Porto Alegre, a Brazilian city with 1.6 million inhabitants and a successful system for distributing government resources through popular participation.

You are welcome to join our discussion on democracy 2.0 and its biological roots.

Floor Basten

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

About the Cynefin Company

The Cynefin Company (formerly known as Cognitive Edge) was founded in 2005 by Dave Snowden. We believe in praxis and focus on building methods, tools and capability that apply the wisdom from Complex Adaptive Systems theory and other scientific disciplines in social systems. We are the world leader in developing management approaches (in society, government and industry) that empower organisations to absorb uncertainty, detect weak signals to enable sense-making in complex systems, act on the rich data, create resilience and, ultimately, thrive in a complex world.
ABOUT USSUBSCRIBE TO NEWSLETTER

Cognitive Edge Ltd. & Cognitive Edge Pte. trading as The Cynefin Company and The Cynefin Centre.

© COPYRIGHT 2024

< Prev

Dead KM Walking

Patrick Lambe interviewed Larry Prusak and I the other day on the subject of the ...

More posts

Next >

Thirty something

This week I read an article about people in their thirties and how they don’t ...

More posts

linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram