welcome
cartLogin

Gardens, Psychology and Leadership

June 26, 2008

I garden. More in theory than in practice. But I garden. For years, I’ve harboured hopes of bountiful harvests from my tiny vegetable patch. Several summertime pregnancies and a PhD have led to less than impressive vegetable harvests, though I can’t be accused of not having been productive in other areas. Well, this weekend, chaos happened – a hailstorm struck. Hailstones as large as pingpongballs redecorated our car bonnet and wiped out the vegetable patch. Depressing. Everything flattened, berry branches snapped, fruit knocked from trees. Clearly not ‘complex’ – no amount of safe-fail experimentation could have helped me see this emergent phenomenon. The crisis task force is me, my husband, a broom, a rake and a secateurs. So far, so good. A one-off chaotic event. But how would I manage if exposed to a series of hailstorms, locust plagues, droughts and rampant mole attacks? Cry, give up, persist?

This brings me to chaos and complexity and an extension of my first blog. How to know what situation you’re dealing with and what ‘psychology’ is needed for appropriate responses? A friend, coordinator of an organisation focusing on agricultural development, sighed last week after an encounter with a colleague. She had just spent two days discussing the relevance of complexity science in a workshop I co-organised on ‘navigating complexity’. And the next day faced this colleague wanting to standardise context-specific agricultural production processes into THE manual. His insistence on a ‘simple’ product jarred with her perspective on the inherent complexity of agricultural systems. It made her wonder what can be expected of people. Is it that some minds are simply more at home with the knowable, while others perfectly at ease with the emergent? If so, how can this match job expectations? Separate out tasks into the four domains and allocate them according to staff members’ psychologies? How feasible (or useful) would that be? And what to do about oneself as a ‘leader’? How do you know and cope with your own limitations? If you know you’re dealing with complexity but are uncomfortable with a merry jumble of parallel experiments or narratives, you can’t just hand over your job as coordinator. That’s not how management systems work. Or should they?

Irene Guijt

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Related Posts

About the Cynefin Company

The Cynefin Company (formerly known as Cognitive Edge) was founded in 2005 by Dave Snowden. We believe in praxis and focus on building methods, tools and capability that apply the wisdom from Complex Adaptive Systems theory and other scientific disciplines in social systems. We are the world leader in developing management approaches (in society, government and industry) that empower organisations to absorb uncertainty, detect weak signals to enable sense-making in complex systems, act on the rich data, create resilience and, ultimately, thrive in a complex world.
ABOUT US

Cognitive Edge Ltd. & Cognitive Edge Pte. trading as The Cynefin Company and The Cynefin Centre.

© COPYRIGHT 2022. 

Social Links: The Cynefin Company
Social Links: The Cynefin Centre
< Prev

The assertion of identity

- No Comments

An interesting question came up in some one to one discussions yesterday in Bangor. Namely ...

More posts

Next >

Purpose

- No Comments

A late night return last night, and getting ready for a four week round the ...

More posts

linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram