A good conversation in Moscow this morning with David Anderson around and about the issue of managing a complex system and as is the way with discussion a half formed idea or two coalesced. I've been teaching how to intervene in a complex system for years, developing and then using the ABIDE perspective question for example. More recently, based on UNDP work we've been mapping out what elements can be scaled. Then we have three basic questions: (i) what can I change? (ii) Of those things that I can change, where can I monitor the impact of that change? (iii) Of those things where I can monitor the impact, where can I amplify success or dampen failure? All of that is good stuff, but then we come to question of more specifically how do I achieve change.
Now David started to talk about some of the things he does, all of which made sense. I was comparing it with some of processes we teach, for example the shallow dive into chaos which contrasts with the use of chaos with malice aforethought that characterises deliberate schumpeterian disruption. I characterised the shallow dive as creating multiple small infections of cowpox to avoid the greater disaster of smallpox. As he talked I started to see a pattern here which matched some other things we teach on the accreditation courses. And from that pattern I started to think about how to make it memorable and from that I got to the three Cs. It's an old trick in methods and nothing wrong with it.
Underneath this of course we have some principles, namely that you cannot determine the outcome in a complex system. Instead you have to make changes in the present and respond to emergent properties. So how to make those changes? Well you can:
Now of course none of these are categories, they are ways of thinking about interventions from different perspectives. But that is the whole point of complexity thinking. Change the perspective and the change the people.
Cognitive Edge Ltd. & Cognitive Edge Pte. trading as The Cynefin Company and The Cynefin Centre.
© COPYRIGHT 2022.